Home / Study Materials / KTU B.Tech S5 Lecture Notes Software Architecture & Design Patterns

KTU B.Tech S5 Lecture Notes Software Architecture & Design Patterns

KTU B.Tech S5 Lecture Notes Software Architecture & Design Patterns



Define Software:

Computer software is the product that software engineers design and build. It encompasses programs that execute within a computer of any size and architecture, documents that encompass hard-copy and virtual forms, and data that combine numbers and text but also includes representations of pictorial, video, and audio information. The software development is done by Software engineers and virtually everyone in the industrialized world uses it either directly or indirectly.

Software Characteristics

To gain an understanding of software (and ultimately an understanding of software engineering), it is important to examine the characteristics of software that make it different from other things that human beings build. When hardware is built, the human creative process (analysis, design, construction, testing) is ultimately translated into a physical form. If we build a new computer, our initial sketches, formal design drawings, and breadboarded prototype evolve into a physical product (chips, circuit boards, power supplies, etc.).

Software is a logical rather than a physical system element. Therefore, software has characteristics that are considerably different than those of hardware:

  1. 1. Software is developed or engineered; it is not manufactured in the classical sense. Although some similarities exist between software development and hardware manufacture, the two activities are fundamentally different. In both activities, high quality is achieved through good design, but the manufacturing phase for hardware can introduce quality problems that are nonexistent (or easily corrected) for software.
  2. Software doesn’t “wear out.”

The hardware exhibits relatively high failure rates early in its life (these failures are often attributable to design or manufacturing defects); defects are corrected and the failure rate drops to a steady-state level

(Ideally, quite low) for some period of time. As time passes, however, the failure rate rises again as hardware components suffer from the cumulative affects of dust, vibration, abuse, temperature extremes, and many other environmental maladies. Stated simply, the hardware begins to wear out. Software is not susceptible to the environmental maladies that cause hardware to wear out.

  1. Although the industry is moving toward component-based assembly, most software continues to be custom built.

Software Application Domains:

Software Applications

Software may be applied in any situation for which a prespecified set of procedural steps (i.e., an algorithm) has been defined (notable exceptions to this rule are expert system software and neural  network software). Information content and determinacy are important factors in determining the nature of a software application. Content refers to the meaning and form of incoming and outgoing information. For example, many business applications use highly structured input data (a database) and produce formatted “reports.” Software that controls an automated machine (e.g., a numerical control) accepts discrete data items with limited structure and produces individual machine commands in rapid succession. Information determinacy refers to the predictability of the order and timing of information.

An engineering analysis program accepts data that have a predefined order, executes the analysis algorithm(s) without interruption, and produces resultant data in report or graphical format. Such applications are determinate. A multiuser operating system, on the other hand, accepts inputs that have varied content and arbitrary timing, executes algorithms that can be interrupted by external conditions, and produces output that varies as a function of environment and time. Applications with these characteristics are indeterminate. It is somewhat difficult to develop meaningful generic categories for software applications. As software complexity grows, neat compartmentalization disappears. The

following software areas indicate the breadth of potential applications:

System software.

System software is a collection of programs written to service other programs. Some system software (e.g., compilers, editors, and file management utilities) process complex, but determinate, information structures. Other systems applications (e.g., operating system components, drivers, telecommunications

processors) process largely indeterminate data. In either case, the system software

area is characterized by heavy interaction with computer hardware; heavy usage by

multiple users; concurrent operation that requires scheduling, resource sharing, and

sophisticated process management; complex data structures; and multiple external


Real-time software. Software that monitors/analyzes/controls real-world events

as they occur is called real time. Elements of real-time software include a data gathering

component that collects and formats information from an external environment,

an analysis component that transforms information as required by the

application, a control/output component that responds to the external environment,

and a monitoring component that coordinates all other components so that real-time

response (typically ranging from 1 millisecond to 1 second) can be maintained.

Business software. Business information processing is the largest single software

application area. Discrete “systems” (e.g., payroll, accounts receivable/payable, inventory)

have evolved into management information system (MIS) software that accesses one or more large databases containing business information. Applications in this

area restructure existing data in a way that facilitates business operations or management

decision making. In addition to conventional data processing application,

business software applications also encompass interactive computing (e.g., pointof-

sale transaction processing).

Engineering and scientific software. Engineering and scientific software have

been characterized by “number crunching” algorithms. Applications range from astronomy

to volcanology, from automotive stress analysis to space shuttle orbital dynamics,

and from molecular biology to automated manufacturing. However, modern

applications within the engineering/scientific area are moving away from conventional

numerical algorithms. Computer-aided design, system simulation, and other

interactive applications have begun to take on real-time and even system software


Embedded software. Intelligent products have become commonplace in nearly

every consumer and industrial market. Embedded software resides in read-only memory

and is used to control products and systems for the consumer and industrial markets.

Embedded software can perform very limited and esoteric functions (e.g., keypad

control for a microwave oven) or provide significant function and control capability

(e.g., digital functions in an automobile such as fuel control, dashboard displays, and

braking systems).

Personal computer software. The personal computer software market has burgeoned

over the past two decades. Word processing, spreadsheets, computer graphics,

multimedia, entertainment, database management, personal and business financial

applications, external network, and database access are only a few of hundreds of


Web-based software. The Web pages retrieved by a browser are software that

incorporates executable instructions (e.g., CGI, HTML, Perl, or Java), and data (e.g., hypertext and a variety of visual and audio formats). In essence, the network becomes a massive computer providing an almost unlimited software resource that can be accessed by anyone with a modem.

Artificial intelligence software. Artificial intelligence (AI) software makes use of nonnumerical algorithms to solve complex problems that are not amenable to computation or straightforward analysis. Expert systems, also called knowledge based systems, pattern recognition (image and voice), artificial neural networks, theorem proving, and game playing are representative of applications within this category.

Legacy Programs/ Legacy Software:

Today, a growing population of legacy programs is forcing many companies to pursue software reengineering strategies. In a global sense, software reengineering is often considered as part of business process reengineering.

The term legacy programs is a euphemism for older, often poorly designed and documented software that is business critical and must be supported over many years. Some legacy systems have relatively solid program architecture, but individual modules were coded in a way that makes them difficult to understand, test, and maintain. In such cases, the code within the suspect modules can be restructured. To accomplish this activity, the source code is analyzed using a restructuring tool. Violations of structured programming constructs are noted and code is then restructured (this can be done automatically). The resultant restructured code is reviewed and tested to ensure that no anomalies have been introduced. Internal code documentation is updated. In some cases, c/s or OO systems designed to replace a legacy application should be approached as a new development project. Reengineering enters the picture only when elements of an old system are to be integrated with the new architecture. In some cases, you may be better off rejecting the old and creating identical new functionality.

Software Engineering:

Software Engineering: (1) The application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software; that is, the application of engineering to software. (2) The study of approaches as in (1).

Engineering is the analysis, design, construction, verification, and management of technical (or social) entities. Regardless of the entity to be engineered, the following questions must be asked and answered:

  • What is the problem to be solved?
  • What characteristics of the entity are used to solve the problem?

How will the entity (and the solution) be realized?

  • How will the entity be constructed?
  • What approach will be used to uncover errors that were made in the design and construction of the entity?
  • How will the entity be supported over the long term, when corrections, adaptations, and enhancements are requested by users of the entity?

The definition phase focuses on what. That is, during definition, the software engineer attempts to identify what information is to be processed, what function and performance are desired, what system behavior can be expected, what interfaces are to be established, what design constraints exist, and what validation criteria are required to define a successful system. The key requirements of the system and the software are identified. Although the methods applied during the definition phase will vary

depending on the software engineering paradigm (or combination of paradigms) that is applied, three major tasks will occur in some form: system or information engineering. The support phase focuses on change associated with error correction, adaptations required as the software’s environment evolves, and changes due to enhancements brought about by changing customer requirements. The support phase reapplies the steps of the definition and development phases but does so in the context of existing software. Four types of change are encountered during the support phase:

Correction. Even with the best quality assurance activities, it is likely that the customer will uncover defects in the software. Corrective maintenance changes the software to correct defects.

Adaptation. Over time, the original environment (e.g., CPU, operating system, business rules, external product characteristics) for which the software was developed is likely to change. Adaptive maintenance results in modification to the software to accommodate changes to its external environment.

Enhancement. As software is used, the customer/user will recognize additional functions that will provide benefit. Perfective maintenance extends the software beyond its original functional requirements.

Prevention. Computer software deteriorates due to change, and because of this, preventive maintenance, often called software reengineering, must be conducted to enable the software to serve the needs of its end users. In essence, preventive maintenance makes changes to computer programs so that they can

be more easily corrected, adapted, and enhanced. In addition to these support activities, the users of software require continuing support. In-house technical assistants, telephone-help desks, and application-specific Web sites are often implemented as part of the support phase.

Today, a growing population of legacy programs1 is forcing many companies to pursue software reengineering strategies (Chapter 30). In a global sense, software reengineering is often considered as part of business process reengineering. The phases and related steps described in our generic view of software engineering are complemented by a number of umbrella activities. Typical activities in this category include:

  • Software project tracking and control
  • Formal technical reviews
  • Software quality assurance
  • Software configuration management
  • Document preparation and production
  • Reusability management
  • Measurement • Risk management

The Software Process:

A software process can be characterized as shown in Figure. A common process framework is established by defining a small number of framework activities that are applicable to all software projects, regardless of their size or complexity. A number of task sets—each a collection of software engineering work tasks, project milestones, work products, and quality assurance points—enable the framework activities to be adapted to the characteristics of the software project and the requirements of the project team. Finally, umbrella activities—such as software quality assurance, software configuration management, and measurement2—overlay the process model.

Umbrella activities are independent of any one framework activity and occur throughout the process. In recent years, there has been a significant emphasis on “process maturity.” The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) has developed a comprehensive model predicated on a set of software engineering capabilities that should be present as organizations reach different levels of process maturity. To determine an organization’s current state of process maturity, the SEI uses an assessment that results in a five point grading scheme. The grading scheme determines compliance with a capability maturity model (CMM) [PAU93] that defines key activities required at different levels of process maturity. The SEI approach provides a measure of the global effectiveness of a company’s software engineering practices and establishes five process maturity levels that are defined in the following manner:

Level 1: Initial. The software process is characterized as ad hoc and occasionally even chaotic. Few processes are defined, and success depends on individual effort.

Level 2: Repeatable. Basic project management processes are established to track cost, schedule, and functionality. The necessary process discipline is in place to repeat earlier successes on projects with similar applications.

Level 3: Defined. The software process for both management and engineering activities is documented, standardized, and integrated into an organizationwide software process. All projects use a documented and approved version of the organization’s process for developing and supporting software. This level includes all characteristics defined for level 2.

Level 4: Managed. Detailed measures of the software process and product quality are collected. Both the software process and products are quantitatively understood and controlled using detailed measures. This level includes all characteristics defined for level 3.

Level 5: Optimizing. Continuous process improvement is enabled by quantitative feedback from the process and from testing innovative ideas and technologies. This level includes all characteristics defined for level 4.

The five levels defined by the SEI were derived as a consequence of evaluating responses to the SEI assessment questionnaire that is based on the CMM. The results of the questionnaire are distilled to a single numerical grade that provides an indication of an organization’s process maturity. The SEI has associated key process areas (KPAs) with each of the maturity levels. The KPAs describe those software engineering functions (e.g., software project planning, requirements management) that must be present to satisfy good practice at a particular level. Each KPA is described by identifying the following characteristics:

  • Goals—the overall objectives that the KPA must achieve.
  • Commitments—requirements (imposed on the organization) that must be met to achieve the goals or provide proof of intent to comply with the goals.
  • Abilities—those things that must be in place (organizationally and technically) to enable the organization to meet the commitments.
  • Activities—the specific tasks required to achieve the KPA function.
  • Methods for monitoring implementation—the manner in which the activities are monitored as they are put into place.
  • Methods for verifying implementation—the manner in which proper practice for the KPA can be verified. Eighteen KPAs (each described using these characteristics) are defined across the maturity model and mapped into different levels of process maturity. The following KPAs should be achieved at each process maturity level:3

Process maturity level 2

  • Software configuration management
  • Software quality assurance
  • Software subcontract management
  • Software project tracking and oversight
  • Software project planning
  • Requirements management

Process maturity level 3

  • Peer reviews
  • Intergroup coordination
  • Software product engineering
  • Integrated software management
  • Training program
  • Organization process definition
  • Organization process focus

Process maturity level 4

  • Software quality management
  • Quantitative process management

Process maturity level 5

  • Process change management
  • Technology change management
  • Defect prevention

Each of the KPAs is defined by a set of key practices that contribute to satisfying its goals. The key practices are policies, procedures, and activities that must occur before a key process area has been fully

instituted. The SEI defines key indicators as “those key practices or components of key practices that offer the greatest insight into whether the goals of a key process area have been achieved.” Assessment questions are designed to probe for the existence (or lack thereof) of a key indicator.

Software Myths

Many causes of a software affliction can be traced to a mythology that arose during the early history of software development. Unlike ancient myths that often provide human lessons well worth heeding, software myths propagated misinformation and confusion. Software myths had a number of attributes that made them insidious; for instance, they appeared to be reasonable statements of fact (sometimes containing elements of truth), they had an intuitive feel, and they were often promulgated by experienced practitioners who “knew the score.” Today, most knowledgeable professionals recognize myths for what they are misleading attitudes that have caused serious problems for managers and technical people alike. However, old attitudes and habits are difficult to modify, and remnants

of software myths are still believed.

Management myths. Managers with software responsibility like managers in most disciplines, are often under pressure to maintain budgets, keep schedules from slipping, and improve quality. Like a drowning person who grasps at a straw, a software manager often grasps at belief in a software myth, if that belief will lessen the pressure (even temporarily).

Myth: We already have a book that’s full of standards and procedures for building software, won’t that provide my people with everything they need to know?

Reality: The book of standards may very well exist, but is it used? Are software practitioners aware of its existence? Does it reflect modern software engineering practice? Is it complete? Is it streamlined to improve time to delivery while still maintaining a focus on quality? In many cases, the answer to all of these questions is “no.”

Myth: My people have state-of-the-art software development tools, after all, we buy them the newest computers.

Reality: It takes much more than the latest model mainframe, workstation, or PC to do high-quality software development. Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tools are more important than hardware for achieving good quality and productivity, yet the majority of software developers still do not use them effectively.

Myth: If we get behind schedule, we can add more programmers and catch up (sometimes called the Mongolian horde concept).

Reality: Software development is not a mechanistic process like manufacturing. later.” At first, this statement may seem counterintuitive. However, as new people are added, people who were working must spend time educating the newcomers, thereby reducing the amount of time spent on productive development effort. People can be added but only in a planned and well-coordinated manner.

Myth: If I decide to outsource3 the software project to a third party, I can just relax and let that firm build it.

Reality: If an organization does not understand how to manage and control software projects internally, it will invariably struggle when it outsources software projects.

Customer myths. A customer who requests computer software may be a person at the next desk, a technical group down the hall, the marketing/sales department, or an outside company that has requested software under contract. In many cases, the customer believes myths about software because software managers and practitioners do little to correct misinformation. Myths lead to false expectations (by the

customer) and ultimately, dissatisfaction with the developer.

Myth: A general statement of objectives is sufficient to begin writing programs— we can fill in the details later.

Reality: A poor up-front definition is the major cause of failed software efforts. A formal and detailed description of the information domain, function, behavior, performance, interfaces, design constraints, and validation criteria is essential. These characteristics can be determined only after thorough communication between customer and developer.

Myth: Project requirements continually change, but change can be easily accommodated because software is flexible.

Reality: It is true that software requirements change, but the impact of change varies with the time at which it is introduced. Figure 1.3 illustrates the impact of change. If serious attention is given to up-front definition, early requests for change can be accommodated easily. The customer can review requirements and recommend modifications with relatively little impact on cost. When changes are requested during software design, the cost impact grows rapidly. Resources have been committed

and a design framework has been established. Change can cause upheaval that requires additional resources and major design modification, that is, additional cost. Changes in function, performance, interface, or other characteristics during implementation (code and test) have a severe impact on cost. Change, when requested after software is in production, can be over an order of magnitude more expensive than the same change requested earlier.

Practitioner’s myths. Myths that are still believed by software practitioners have been fostered by 50 years of programming culture. During the early days of software, programming was viewed as an art form. Old ways and attitudes die hard.

Myth: Once we write the program and get it to work, our job is done.

Reality: Someone once said that “the sooner you begin ‘writing code’, the longer it’ll take you to get done.” Industry data ([LIE80], [JON91], [PUT97]) indicate that between 60 and 80 percent of all effort expended on software will be expended after it is delivered to the customer for the first time.

Myth: Until I get the program “running” I have no way of assessing its quality.

Reality: One of the most effective software quality assurance mechanisms can be applied from the inception of a project—the formal technical review. Software reviews (described in Chapter 8) are a “quality filter” that have been found to be more effective than testing for finding certain classes of software defects.

Myth: The only deliverable work product for a successful project is the working program.

Reality: A working program is only one part of a software configuration that includes many elements. Documentation provides a foundation for successful engineering and, more important, guidance for software support.

Myth: Software engineering will make us create voluminous and unnecessary documentation and will invariably slow us down.

Reality: Software engineering is not about creating documents. It is about creating quality. Better quality leads to reduced rework. And reduced rework results in faster delivery times.


Process Models

To solve actual problems in an industry setting, a software engineer or a team of engineers must incorporate a development strategy that encompasses the process, methods, and tools layers and the generic phases This strategy is often referred to as a process model or a software engineering paradigm. A process model for software engineering is chosen based on the nature of the project and application, the methods and tools to be used, and the controls and deliverables that are required. In an intriguing paper on the nature of the software process, L. B. S. Raccoon [RAC95] uses fractals as the basis for a discussion of the true nature of the software process.


Further Module Notes will be added shortly…


Check Also

KTU B.Tech S6 Lecture Notes Heat and Mass Transfer

KTU B.Tech S6 Lecture Notes Heat and Mass Transfer   MODULE I ...

KTU B.Tech S6 Lecture Notes  VLSI

KTU B.Tech S6 Lecture Notes  VLSI KTU B.Tech S6 Lecture Notes EC304 VLSI ...